On the afternoon of March 15, 2024, the Academic Board of the E-PhD Program organized a research proposal feedback session for doctoral candidates from cohorts 6 and 7 of the English-taught Doctoral Program at room 1501, Building A1, National Economics University.

Overview of the feedback session

The research proposal feedback session for doctoral candidates was attended by members of the program's Academic Board, including Associate Professor Dr. Bach Ngoc Thang from the Institute for Sustainable Development, Dr. Nguyen Xuan Thang from the Institute of Postgraduate Studies, Associate Professor Dr. Nguyen Vu Hung from the Institute of Trade and International Economics, and Dr. Tran Huy Duc from the Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality. The session also welcomed the participation of doctoral candidates along with their supervising faculty members.

Opening the feedback session, Associate Professor Dr. Le Quang Canh extended his welcome and gratitude to all participating faculty members and doctoral candidates. The purpose of this session was to listen to, review, and provide feedback on the research proposals submitted by the doctoral candidates.

Each doctoral candidate was allocated a maximum of 20 minutes to present their research proposal, followed by 40 minutes for receiving comments, feedback, and engaging in open discussions with Academic Board members and other attendees. 

Doctoral candidate Nguyen Minh Hoa - EPHD7 presenting her research proposal
Doctoral candidate Vu An Dan - EPHD7 presenting his research proposal

The research proposals received extensive feedback from Academic Board members, faculty, and fellow doctoral candidates. These contributions represent valuable input for the process of refining the research proposals and making decisions regarding thesis topic assignment and supervisor allocation. This presentation session is mandatory for all program candidates, with each doctoral candidate receiving individual feedback records following their presentation to serve as the foundation for official decisions on thesis topic titles and supervisor assignments.

The reporting session concluded successfully thanks to the enthusiastic participation of Academic Board members, participating faculty involved in teaching and program management, supervisors, and the full attendance of doctoral candidates participating in this round of reporting and presentations.

Selected images from the review session:

Article and photos: Institute for Sustainable Development

en_USEN